Trump ballot ruling in Colorado sparks death threats: Live updates

Trump’s estranged former legal professional basic William Barr was interviewed on CNN yesterday and expressed his disapproval of the Colorado Supreme Courtroom’s resolution.

“I strongly oppose Donald Trump for the Republican nomination, however I feel that this case is legally incorrect and untenable,” he mentioned.

“And I feel this type of motion of stretching the regulation, taking these hyper-aggressive positions to attempt to knock Trump out of the race are counterproductive. They backfire.

“He feeds on grievance similar to a hearth feeds on oxygen. And that is going to finish up as a grievance that helps him.”

Right here’s a reminder of how Trump’s fellow contenders for the Republican nomination responded from Ariana Baio.

Whereas most Republicans are fuming concerning the Colorado Supreme Courtroom’s resolution this week, 54 per cent of the three,500 US residents surveyed by YouGov yesterday mentioned they agreed with it and solely 35 per cent actively disagreed.

Almost two thirds of Democrats polled, 63 per cent, mentioned they strongly authorised, with one other 21 per cent solely “considerably” approving.

Amongst independents, 48 per cent supported the decision and 35 per cent had been opposed.

Twenty 4 per cent of GOP voters thought it was proper resolution (virtually 1 / 4!) however 66 per cent disapproved.

Jena Griswold, Colorado’s secretary of state, says she has acquired “a whole bunch if not hundreds” of threats because the lawsuit was filed in opposition to Trump difficult his eligibility to look on the 2024 presidential election poll within the state.

“I’ve been involved about violence and threats of violence since Donald Trump incited the rebel,” Griswold instructed The Huffington Put up.

“Inside three weeks of it being filed, I acquired 64 loss of life threats and over 900 non-lethal threats of abuse. I ended counting after that.”

I don’t suppose he goes in a lot for introspection however it’s a very good thought.

The US Supreme Courtroom might decide whether or not Trump is immune from prison prosecution for crimes linked to the January 6 assault on the US Capitol and whether or not his identify could be faraway from ballots due to them.

These two main constitutional questions earlier than the nation’s highest court docket – the place three of the 9 justices had been appointed by the previous president – arrive in the midst of the 2024 race for the presidency and will have resounding impacts past Trump’s marketing campaign.

The Supreme Courtroom is contemplating whether or not Mr Trump has “presidential immunity” from fees linked to his makes an attempt to subvert the end result of the 2020 presidential election, together with his failure to cease a mob of his supporters from breaking into the halls of Congress to cease the certification of the outcomes.

His marketing campaign additionally pledged to go to the Supreme Courtroom following the Colorado ruling that bars him from showing on 2024 ballots beneath the 14th Modification of the US Structure, which prohibits candidates who “engaged in rebel or rebel” from holding public workplace.

These questions underscore the huge function that courtrooms have performed in Trump’s brutal marketing campaign for the White Home in 2024, a marketing campaign that frames the 91 prison fees, fraud lawsuits and sexual abuse and defamation claims in opposition to him as proof of a conspiracy to maintain him away from the presidency.

Trump has promised vengeance in opposition to his political enemies if he wins one other White Home time period.

Trump’s attorneys have urged the US Supreme Courtroom to reject an try and shortly hear a problem of his “presidential immunity” defence on fees linked to his makes an attempt to overturn 2020 presidential election outcomes.

A submitting with the nation’s highest court docket on Wednesday responds to a request from Justice Division particular counsel Jack Smith to expedite consideration of the previous president’s “immunity” declare in a federal election conspiracy case that Trump needs thrown out.

The federal choose overseeing that case has rejected these arguments and Trump has vowed to enchantment. However prosecutors turned to the Supreme Courtroom for a definitive reply to find out “whether or not a former President is totally immune from federal prosecution for crimes dedicated whereas in workplace or is constitutionally protected against federal prosecution when he has been impeached however not convicted earlier than the prison proceedings start.”

On Wednesday, Trump’s attorneys instructed the Supreme Courtroom to reject their request and accused prosecutors of attempting to “bypass” their enchantment.

President Joe Biden has mentioned that there’s “no query” that his predecessor Donald Trump supported an rebel after Colorado’s state Supreme Courtroom dominated that Trump is ineligible for the presidency.

Biden spoke to reporters in Milwaukee and was requested whether or not he believed the Republican was an insurrectionist.

“It’s self-evident,” he answered. “You noticed all of it. Now whether or not the 14th Modification applies, I’ll let the court docket make that call. However he definitely supported an rebel. There’s no query about it. None. Zero.”

Whereas the Magaverse is livid over the Colorado Supreme Courtroom’s ruling, one one that is frankly loving all of it is the president’s estranged niece Dr Mary L Trump.

She reacted to Tuesday’s information on X with a few gleeful ketchup posts in reference to the previous White Home aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s amusing revelation to the Home Jan 6 committee final 12 months that Trump threw his lunch on the wall in anger when he realized that his then-attorney basic Invoice Barr had admitted there was no proof to substantiate his boss’s bogus election fraud narrative.

Should you’re fascinated with Trump’s insurgent niece turned nemesis, right here’s a profile.

Texas lieutenant governor Dan Patrick was one in all many Republicans who lashed out at Democrats over the Colorado Supreme Courtroom’s contentious ruling however went one additional than the remaining throughout an interview with Laura Ingraham on Fox Information.

Patrick advised that the GOP might transfer to unilaterally exclude Joe Biden from the poll in states like Texas the place it controls native authorities.

He did sofa his daring assertion, nevertheless, by insisting his social gathering wouldn’t really accomplish that as a result of it “consider[s] in democracy”.

“Perhaps we should always take Joe Biden off the poll in Texas for permitting 8m individuals to cross the border since he’s been president, disrupting our state way over something anybody else has carried out in latest historical past,” had been his precise phrases.

Trump’s former adviser Kellyanne Conway really made the identical proposition to South Dakota governor Kristi Noem on the identical community however the latter politely demured.

The Colorado verdict can be making waves in California too, in keeping with The Each day Beast, the place a motion is reportedly underway to get Trump caught off there as effectively.

John Bowden has extra on Patrick.

So has Donald Trump come to phrases with the Colorado Supreme Courtroom’s ruling that he’s constitutionally ineligible to carry public workplace ever once more attributable to his function within the 6 January rebellion on the US Capitol?

No. No he hasn’t. In fact not.

As a substitute, he has been busily stewing on Fact Social, posting help for his fellow wounded conservatives and indignant all-caps howls like this:

Right here’s a recap of his response yesterday courtesy of IndyTV.

Ms Haley instructed reporters in Iowa that whereas she doesn’t consider Mr Trump needs to be president, it needs to be as much as the voters to determine if he obtains the workplace, not judges.

“I don’t suppose Donald Trump must be president, I feel I have to be president. I feel that’s good for the nation,” Ms Haley mentioned.

“We don’t have to have judges making these selections, we’d like voters to make these selections so I wish to see this within the arms of the voters. We’re going to win this the appropriate method, we’re going to do what we have to do,” she added.

The previous South Carolina governor and UN ambassador mentioned “the very last thing” the nation wants is judges deciding who could be on the poll.