[ad_1]
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has issued a 3rd summons to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, directing him to look earlier than the company on January 3, in response to information company ANI. Kejriwal, who skipped the second summons on Thursday, has accused political rivals of orchestrating the summons to stifle opposition voices within the run-up to the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. The ED has summoned Kejriwal for questioning in a Delhi excise policy-linked cash laundering case.
The chief minister, who left for an undisclosed location for a 10-day Vipassana meditation course on Wednesday, despatched his reply to the ED on the identical day, asserting that the summons lacked readability concerning whether or not he was referred to as as a witness, a suspect, or in his capability because the chief minister, information company PTI reported.
ALSO READ | WATCH: Bajrang Punia Walks Away After Leaving Padma Shri Medal On Pavement Close to Kartavya Path
Delhi Liquor Coverage Case: Arvind Kejriwal’s Earlier Response To ED Summons
In his reply, Kejriwal expressed issues in regards to the timing of the summons, suggesting political motives behind it. “The timing of your summons leaves a lot to want and strengthens my perception that the summons being despatched to me should not based mostly upon any goal or rational yardstick however for extraneous concerns on the behest of political rivals who want to silence the voice of opposition,” he said, as quoted by PTI.
Kejriwal’s Aam Aadmi Get together (AAP) is a part of the opposition I.N.D.I.A. bloc, shaped to problem the BJP within the upcoming Lok Sabha polls. The chief minister emphasised that the ED served the recent summons with out addressing the problems raised in his earlier reply, deeming it a “fishing and roving enquiry.”
“I’ve a lifetime of dignity, honour, and with full transparency. As per my schedule, publicly identified to all, from 20.12.2023, I’d be attending the Vipassana meditation course which I’ve been attending yearly for the final 25 years,” he said in his reply, as per PTI’s report.
He underscored his constitutional place as an elected chief and the incumbent chief minister, emphasising his dedication to transparency and the lawful compliance of any summons. “However the summons is (I’m suggested) not in consonance with the legislation,” he mentioned, as talked about by the report.
Delhi Minister Atishi, in a press convention on Thursday, alleged that the ED’s investigation into the excise coverage case aimed to impede AAP’s progress and recognition. The ED has been probing the case for 2 years, and Atishi claimed it was unprecedented for a coverage to be investigated to such an extent with out discovering proof.
Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva countered, questioning why, if there was nothing unsuitable with the liquor coverage, AAP leaders withdrew it when a CBI inquiry was ordered. He additionally identified that leaders like Manish Sisodia and Sanjay Singh weren’t acquiring bail.
Subscribe And Comply with ABP Reside On Telegram: https://t.me/officialabplive
[ad_2]
Source link
