Two Russian bankers left in EU limbo, despite court win

The EU Council had managed to show “a level of proximity between Petr Aven and Mikhail Fridman and [Russian president] Vladimir Putin or his entourage”, it stated.

However this did “not exhibit that they’ve supported actions or insurance policies that undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine”, the courtroom added.

The pair’s French law-firm, Kiejman & Marembert, advised EUobserver: “As we speak’s choices are of the utmost significance. The courtroom rightly discovered that each one accusations in opposition to Mr Mikhail Fridman and Mr Petr Aven had been utterly baseless”.

“Sanctioning them was a counterproductive mistake. They don’t have anything to do on the EU’s checklist nor another checklist,” it stated.

Aven and Fridman will stay frozen out of EU journey and banking in the intervening time, nevertheless.

The EU Council first has two months and 10 days to resolve if it should attraction.

In the meantime, Aven and Fridman had been additionally blacklisted by the EU in a second choice in 2023, which stays subjected to separate lawsuits that haven’t been dominated on but.

“There may be as but no date set for the judgment in these instances,” a European Court docket of Justice (ECJ) spokesman stated.

The EU Council additionally has the choice of re-blacklisting Aven and Fridman on barely totally different grounds in September, when the EU’s Russia sanctions come up for his or her subsequent six-monthly overview.

And so, for now, the Russian bankers joined Russian racing driver Nikita Mazepin, who additionally gained an annulment in March, within the EU’s authorized limbo.

Theirs had been only a handful of some 115 EU courtroom instances linked to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

And others had been additionally beginning to mature after 18 months or extra of litigation and lobbying, involving related claims of nebulous EU Council proof.

A notable variety of different Russia instances and appeals was anticipated to be determined earlier than the ECJ’s summer season recess in July, an EU contact stated.

EU sanctions in opposition to Aven and Fridman had detailed their relations with Putin.

Aven’s “friendship” with Putin went again to St Petersburg within the Nineties, they met “usually”, and Aven’s financial institution labored on a charity venture with Putin’s daughter Maria, the EU Council stated.

Fridman was a “a high Russian financier and enabler of Putin’s interior circle”, whose Alfa Financial institution group insured Russian army automobiles in Ukraine and produced T-shirts with the pro-war Z brand, the EU additionally stated.

Join EUobserver’s every day e-newsletter

All of the tales we publish, despatched at 7.30 AM.

By signing up, you conform to our Phrases of Use and Privateness Coverage.

However the EU courtroom nonetheless backed the Russians’ place that it was “neither dependable nor credible” to say they’d contributed to Russia’s battle effort.

When requested how Wednesday’s verdict boded for different anti-EU lawsuits, Kiejman & Marembert stated: “We consider Messrs Fridman and Aven’s scenario is exclusive, so it’s arduous to inform what implications these choices may need, if any, in different instances”.

Its assertion additionally stated, nevertheless: “We hope that as we speak’s sturdy sign shall be heard within the EU and out of doors”.

William Julié, from French law-firm Wj Avocats, which has represented different Russians in profitable anti-EU sanctions choices, additionally cautioned that every case had its “personal particularities”.

However commenting on latest EU courtroom verdicts, Julié added: “There appears to be a pattern and a minimum of one frequent theme: the Council can’t depend on proof or actions that came about up to now to sanction a person — particularly as a result of itemizing standards are worded within the current tense”.

EU limbo

The EU has blacklisted 2,177 people and entities over Putin’s invasion and simply eight people have managed to get delisted up to now two years.

Their delistings got here following a combination of EU courtroom victories and out-of-court EU Council choices.

Three of these delisted additionally had EU citizenship and Aven was “of Russian and Latvian nationality”, the EU courtroom famous in passing on Wednesday, in what may enhance his possibilities.

Aven was born in Moscow in 1955, however his grandfather was Latvian, and he was naturalised in 2016 after passing a language examination.

EU sanctions forbid pro-Russian lobbying of EU establishments or member states’ governments by European legislation companies or PR consultancies.

However Croatia, Hungary, and Slovakia have pushed to get their Russian associates or personal nationals efficiently delisted up to now, whereas Russian oligarchs’ lobbyists and spin docs are free to go to EU capitals.

And the truth that Aven and Fridman, like Mazepin, remained on the EU blacklist for now regardless of their “annulments” confirmed that litigation alone may not be sufficient to get off the hook.