[ad_1]
Alejandro Garnacho appreciated two posts on social media that criticised supervisor Erik ten Hag within the wake of Manchester United’s 2-2 draw with Bournemouth on Saturday.
The 19-year-old was withdrawn at half-time of the sport, with Ten Hag later singling Garnacho’s efficiency out after the sport by admitting he felt the group wanted extra high quality down the proper wing.
United fan and broadcaster Mark Goldbridge took to X after the match to criticise Ten Hag’s resolution to name out Garnacho, who’s behind solely Bruno Fernandes on United’s targets and assists charts, and declare that the United boss was “petrified of upsetting the larger earners” within the squad.
Garnacho was seen liking each posts earlier than ultimately eradicating his response.
This isn’t the primary time Garnacho has appreciated posts involving Ten Hag’s resolution to substitute him. Earlier this month, he appreciated a put up questioning his withdrawal from the sport towards Chelsea, and that response stays lively on the time of writing.
Ten Hag repeatedly highlighted shortcomings on United’s proper aspect after the sport earlier than admitting he substituted Garnacho to “restore” his aspect.
“That [Dominic] Solanke was dropping in, we did not anticipate, one thing to do with our organisation, that’s one thing I level to, you want some teaching there then you definately cease it on the supply,” he defined.
“Within the second part it was too straightforward, on the proper aspect there was a giant hole and Kluivert ought to by no means get that ball there but when [he does] then we’ve got to shut it, that is clear and apparent.
“I feel we needed to restore over that proper aspect. We did not play properly, the areas have been there in possession, we needed to carry a sub there.
“Garnacho was not coaching throughout the week, solely yesterday, we thought carry some vitality, carry some extra high quality, high quality within the sense of co-operation, togetherness over that proper aspect.”
READ THE LATEST MAN UTD NEWS, TRANSFER RUMOURS & GOSSIP
[ad_2]
Source link