20 years after the enlargement Big Bang: successful convergence in an era of division

On 1st Might 2004, the European Union undertook its most substantial growth but. Dubbed the “Huge Bang,” this enlargement noticed the EU’s cosy membership of 15 predominantly Western and Southern European nations swell by ten new members. Eight of those – Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia – had previously chafed beneath the Soviet yoke. They have been joined by Malta and Cyprus, which weren’t a part of the Jap bloc.

Writing from Switzerland within the Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Nikolai Thelitz and Nina Belz be aware that the brand new entrants to the European Union harboured hopes of financial prosperity and political and social development, whereas outdated members in Western Europe fretted over migration, wage deflation, and the fiscal calls for of broader integration. Helga Schmidt, reporting for German information platform Tagesschau from Brussels, observes that some Western fears have materialised: the EU’s cohesion coverage, geared toward uplifting its much less prosperous areas, has redirected funds predominantly eastwards over the previous 20 years, on the expense of the southern states. Regardless of these shifts, the eastward enlargement is now extensively considered as a triumph for all concerned.

Writing for a similar information outlet, Jenni Rieger notes that Germany now hosts roughly 820,000 staff from international locations that joined the EU in its eastward growth. Opposite to gloomy forecasts, the inflow of staff from these new EU member states didn’t displace German staff. As an alternative, it helped to bridge important gaps within the labour market, with migrants primarily employed in sectors which are much less engaging to native staff resulting from low wages or unappealing work circumstances.

For German companies, the EU’s growth has not solely supplied a brand new pool of labour but in addition opened up new markets, facilitating growth as commerce boundaries fell. Nevertheless, rising dwelling requirements and important wage progress in some sectors in Jap European EU international locations have made Germany much less engaging for immigration than earlier than. These days, new staff now not flock to Germany; as an alternative, there’s a pattern of migrants staying for just a few years earlier than returning dwelling. Economically, the potential for future progress on this space is prone to stagnate within the coming years.

In a equally optimistic tone, Gerald Schubert displays on the “Huge Bang” in his commentary for Der Commonplace, from neighbouring Austria. He argues that the enlargement has introduced appreciable financial advantages, notably to Austria, and has gained renewed significance at the moment amid Russia’s forceful makes an attempt to reclaim its former sphere of affect. Schubert contends that welcoming Central and Jap European democracies into the EU – a union based not as a defence in opposition to exterior foes however as a safeguard in opposition to the inner demons that sparked the horrors of the Second World Conflict – was each prescient and important.

Writing from the geographically extra distant Spain for El Independiente, Ana Alonso notes that the 2004 EU entrants are starting to outshine many longer-standing members. She spotlights Poland, which isn’t solely catching up with Spain in financial growth but in addition surpassing it in political affect inside Europe. Over 20 years of EU membership, Poland has boosted its GDP by 40%, overtaken Portugal in GDP per capita, and is now difficult Spain, buoyed by decrease unemployment and sturdy progress charges. Regardless of the financial shocks from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and internet hosting practically 1,000,000 refugees, Poland’s financial outlook stays upbeat. Moreover, Poland is carving out a big political area of interest in response to Russian hostilities. Alonso means that for Spain to keep up its relevance within the EU, it ought to recognise Poland as a pivotal participant.

In an article for Hrot journal, Miroslav Zámečník, a Czech economist, lauds Poland’s exceptional progress over the previous 20 years. Ranging from a deprived place, Poland has astutely utilised EU funds to boost its infrastructure, laying down hundreds of kilometres of motorways. In distinction, the Czech Republic has seen a proliferation of lookout towers somewhat than substantive infrastructural advances. Equally, writing in Hospodářské noviny, economist Petr J. Kalaš notes that whereas the Czech Republic leads the Visegrad 4 with a lifestyle at 90% of the EU common, its progress has been modest, rising by simply 10% over 20 years. Poland, however, has seen a dramatic 40% rise in dwelling requirements, underscoring its efficient use of EU integration advantages.

“From a black gap to a tiger operating out of breath”: These are the phrases Katarína Runnová makes use of to encapsulate Slovakia’s 20 years of EU membership on the information portal Aktuality.sk. Following the dissolution of Czechoslovakia in 1993, Slovakia grappled with extreme financial and political challenges. Nevertheless, the last decade following its EU accession witnessed a golden period, with financial reforms and a post-accession growth incomes it the moniker “the Tatra Tiger.”

But, the expansion momentum pushed by low cost labour and expertise imports has since waned, and no new financial mannequin is on the horizon. In accordance with Pravda, citing Euractiv analyst Barbara Zmušková, the one viable path ahead is to strengthen the core precept that larger prosperity stems from a unified single market. This contains integrating beforehand separate markets resembling monetary, power, and telecommunications. For Slovakia, the place anti-Brussels sentiment is on the rise, it’s essential for its residents to recognise that the EU international locations, which have contributed billions of euros over the previous 20 years, don’t harbour ailing intentions.

Extra picks

Robert Fico’s Assassination Try: A Turning Level for the Nation’s Future

Matúš Kostolný | Denník N | Might 16 | SK

In accordance with Matúš Kostolný, editor-in-chief of Denník N, the assassination try on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico signifies the top of Slovakia’s post-1989 democratic period. Though typically marked by vulgarity, political battles in Slovakia have been predominantly verbal, often even mental. Kostolný argues that the assassination of politicians is a trademark of totalitarian regimes. He remembers that this isn’t Slovakia’s first political homicide; the killing of journalist Ján Kuciak in 2018 serves as a grim precedent. Historic and international proof means that societal divisions and verbal hostilities can escalate into bodily violence. The assault on Prime Minister Fico, Kostolný asserts, is a crucial juncture. It marks the top of an period of rhetorical skirmishes and heralds a decisive second for Slovakia. Now, the nation should select whether or not it aligns with the civilised, democratic West—the place crimes are adjudicated in courts somewhat than by means of bloodshed.

In partnership with Show Europe, cofunded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are nonetheless these of the writer(s) solely and don’t essentially replicate these of the European Union or the Directorate‑Normal for Communications Networks, Content material and Expertise. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority might be held chargeable for them.