[ad_1]
Presenter withdraws all claims in opposition to broadcaster at WRC after two hours of talks
Chris Greene claimed he had been unfairly sacked after making allegations.
Former 2FM presenter Chris Greene has withdrawn claims of penalisation and unfair dismissal in opposition to RTÉ, whom he had accused of sacking him after he made allegations about office sexual harassment.
The case had been because of open on the Office Relations Fee this morning however was delayed for over two hours for discussions.
When the listening to opened, Mr Greene’s barrister David Byrnes, instructed by Marc Fitzgibbon of Lavelle Companions, mentioned: “We’ve managed to achieve a compromise in relation to all of the claims earlier than the WRC.”
“All have been compromised by written settlement. On that foundation, I’m glad to state my consumer is withdrawing all complaints, and I’m glad to say he’s withdrawing the protected disclosure aspect as effectively,” Mr Byrnes added.
Requested by adjudicator Breiffni O’Neill whether or not she had something so as to add, RTÉ’s barrister Mairead McKenna SC mentioned: “No, thanks on your time and your courtesy to all of the events, as all the time.”
Mr Greene had initially introduced claims in opposition to RTÉ underneath the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977, the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 and the Fee of Wages Act 1991. All of the claims had been contested.
A preliminary listening to final November was informed Mr Greene had introduced considerations relating to “alleged sexual harassment and impropriety within the office” to 2FM chief Dan Healy. His counsel David Byrnes argued that this was a protected disclosure.
However he claimed Mr Greene was penalised by being marginalised at work earlier than being dismissed, and that the dismissal was unfair.
Mr Byrnes mentioned he had not set out the disclosures in written authorized submissions as a result of “the character of these protected disclosures was such that it was preferable and acceptable for them to be first introduced into this room for the safety of my consumer and different witnesses”.
Ms McKenna, instructed by Ailbhe Moloney of Arthur Cox, mentioned the case laid out by the complainant facet was “not clear” and its stance on specifying the disclosures was “grossly unfair”.
“There’s nothing within the written submission that claims there’s one other protected disclosure… We will’t undergo each doc and dream up what the complainant’s case could be,” she mentioned. “It’s too severe for that. We’re entitled to know what it’s,” she added.
On the time of the final listening to, RTÉ disputed Mr Greene’s standing as an worker. The tribunal was informed at the moment that the state broadcaster was interesting a dedication of the Division of Social Safety’s Scope part which discovered Mr Greene had been an worker on the materials time.
Mr Byrnes mentioned his consumer was earlier than the tribunal with a “official expectation” that he was an worker and that the WRC had “no jurisdiction” to reopen the query of his consumer’s employment standing after the Scope ruling.
[ad_2]
Source link
