[ad_1]
Mahua Moitra faces allegations of cash-for-query in parliament
New Delhi:
Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra has claimed the Lok Sabha ethics committee that’s trying into the cash-for-query controversy doesn’t have powers to look at allegations of alleged criminality. She launched her response right now that she had prepped to offer to the committee tomorrow when she seems earlier than them. This, Ms Moitra stated, was as a result of the “ethics committee deemed it match to launch my summons to the media…”
“… I feel it is crucial that I too launch my letter to the committee earlier than the ‘listening to’ tomorrow,” Ms Moitra stated in a put up on X.
In a letter to the committee chairperson Vinod Kumar Sonkar, Ms Moitra claimed the absence of this energy was intentionally stored that manner by “our nation’s founders” to forestall misuse of committees by authorities that get pleasure from brute majority in parliament.
She additionally repeated her demand to cross-examine businessman Darshan Hiranandani. The businessman has alleged Ms Moitra took questions from him to ask in parliament, and in addition admitted he used Ms Moitra’s parliamentary login ID and password to put up questions from Dubai – a state of affairs, if proved, will imply a breach of privilege and result in her suspension from parliament.
Within the put up on X right now, Ms Moitra stated the parliamentary ethics committee is probably not the “applicable discussion board to look at allegations of alleged criminality”.
“I want to respectfully remind you that parliamentary committees wouldn’t have felony jurisdiction and don’t have any mandate to analyze alleged criminality. This will solely be achieved by legislation enforcement companies. This verify was particularly created by our nation’s founders to forestall the slightest misuse of committees by governments having fun with a brute majority in parliament,” Ms Moitra stated in a letter to the ethics committee chairperson Vinod Kumar Sonkar.
Since Ethics Committee deemed it match to launch my summons to the media I feel it is crucial I too launch my letter to the Committee earlier than my “listening to” tomorrow. pic.twitter.com/A8MwFRsImk
— Mahua Moitra (@MahuaMoitra) November 1, 2023
Supreme Court docket lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai, on whose grievance to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) the whole case rests, was cross-examined by the ethics committee on October 26, whereas BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, who led the decision to analyze the allegation that Ms Moitra gave her parliament login ID to the businessman, was allowed to clarify his allegations.
Referring to the CBI grievance, Mr Dubey had written to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and levelled cash-for-query allegations towards Ms Moitra. The Trinamool MP has referred to as the Supreme Court docket lawyer her “jilted ex”.
Ms Moitra, one of many fiercest critics of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP, will seem earlier than the ethics committee tomorrow. She requested the committee to make sure there’s “no room for political partisanship” of their functioning.
She alleged the committee has not made any code of conduct for MPs to observe.
“You will need to observe that until date the committee on ethics has not formulated any code of conduct for members and in reality the committee has not even had any sittings prior to now two years. I want to most respectfully level out that in view of the dearth of a structured code of conduct, it’s all the extra essential that every case be handled in an goal and honest method…” the Trinamool Congress MP stated within the letter to the ethics committee chairperson.
The ethics committee will give a report back to the Lok Sabha Speaker “as early as attainable”, individuals with direct data of the matter advised NDTV final week, referring to the Pawan Bansal committee that gave its report in simply two weeks in December 2005 within the notorious cash-for-questions rip-off when the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) was in energy within the centre.
[ad_2]
Source link
