[ad_1]
Breadcrumb Path Hyperlinks
NewsLocal Information
Column: Pink flags have been waved about the way forward for inexperienced areas, together with some waterfront properties. If these issues have been misplaced, the mayor’s workplace was not answering questions Wednesday to dispel such notions
Article content material
As Vancouver’s council prepares to determine the destiny of town’s elected park board, questions stay round what this vital change might imply for a number of the metropolis’s best-loved public areas.
Present and previous metropolis councillors and park board commissioners have been elevating crimson flags this week about what Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim’s proposed new governance construction might imply for park lands that fall below numerous classifications, which incorporates some iconic waterfront properties.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Article content material
Present park board commissioner Laura Christensen mentioned Wednesday she worries that the proposed modifications might make the roughly 40 per cent of Vancouver parks not formally labeled as “everlasting parks” open to sale, improvement, or “being something aside from a park, which is what it needs to be.”
“This safety that (Sim) has marketed … lulls the general public right into a false sense of safety that they’re not going to lose any inexperienced house,” mentioned Christensen, who was elected final yr to the park board below the ABC banner earlier than quitting the social gathering final week. “However their promise to do something doesn’t matter anymore, as a result of additionally they promised to not abolish the park board.”
If such issues are baseless, the mayor’s workplace was not answering questions Wednesday to dispel such notions.
It’s one in every of a number of unanswered questions as town hurtles towards a potential main change in its governance, solely every week after the general public — and even the elected board members themselves — have been surprised to be taught of the park board’s probably imminent demise.
When Sim unveiled his plan final week to pursue the park board’s dissolution, he emphasised proposed measures to make sure the safety of town’s cherished public parks.
Dawn
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Sim has introduced his proposal as a method to enhance the administration of parks and recreation providers by eliminating a layer of forms.
He has additionally mentioned folding park operations below council jurisdiction would save tens of millions of {dollars} yearly for town. By Wednesday afternoon, as council ready to listen to from greater than 150 individuals signed up to discuss the mayor’s movement, no info had but been made public to help Sim’s public claims about taxpayer financial savings related along with his proposal.
The unusually giant record of audio system was simply getting began Wednesday afternoon, with debate and a call to comply with.
A detailed studying of the movement induced some observers — together with previous metropolis councillors and park board commissioners, and at the least one lawyer — to take pause over a single phrase: “Everlasting.”
Sim’s proposal, as outlined in his movement, would ask the B.C. authorities to remove the elected park board of commissioners and provides all “powers at the moment bestowed on the park board” to metropolis council. Additional, Sim’s movement proposes a “course of for revoking and/or cancelling the designation of areas designated as everlasting public parks,” requiring a “unanimous vote of all council members, together with provisions for a public referendum.”
Commercial 4
Article content material
In an interview final week, Sim emphasised that requiring all 10 councillors and the mayor to log off on such a change is “an extremely excessive bar.”
“We wish everybody to know that so long as I’m mayor of town, parks will at all times be parks, golf programs will at all times be golf programs,” Sim mentioned.
However some observers have latched onto the particular language round “areas designated as everlasting public parks.”
That’s as a result of whereas lots of Vancouver’s public areas are designated as everlasting parks, lots of its best-loved and most well-known parks and seashores don’t bear that formal “everlasting” designation. So what would Sim’s proposed framework imply for these different areas? The mayor’s workplace has not but answered that query.
A 2022 Vancouver park board stock lists town’s parks and seashores designated as “everlasting” and “non permanent.” Areas bearing the “non permanent” designation embrace a part of Jericho Seashore, Sundown Seashore, in addition to Thunderbird Park and Foster Park in East Vancouver.
Postmedia requested Sim’s workplace for clarification on two factors: First, whether or not revoking the park designation for such non permanent parks would require a unanimous vote of council and a referendum, or whether or not that particular safety was solely afforded to parks formally designated as everlasting. And second, whether or not altering the usage of parks not bearing the “everlasting” designation would solely require a easy majority vote of council.
Commercial 5
Article content material
Sim’s chief of workers Trevor Ford despatched an emailed assertion that didn’t reply both of these questions. As an alternative, the assertion learn, in full: “To be as clear, there isn’t a plan, nor will there ever be a plan below Mayor Sim, to promote or develop any of our parks for housing.”
Postmedia responded Wednesday morning, asking Ford and Sim’s press secretary once more if they might reply the 2 beforehand requested questions on what Sim’s plan would imply for any park land not formally designated “everlasting.”
No response had been acquired by deadline Wednesday.
Park’s totally different classifications stem from their totally different histories. Some land got here to be parks by bequeathments, or actual property developments. Parks formally designated as “everlasting” have probably the most safety — revoking their standing at the moment requires a two-thirds majority vote of each council and the park board.
Below the present system, non permanent parks have much less safety, and their standing will be revoked by council with park board approval.
But when council tried to do this immediately — for instance, revoking Sundown Seashore’s park standing — there’s at the moment one other elected physique, the park board, that would attempt to oppose the transfer, mentioned former Vancouver Inexperienced councillor and park commissioner Michael Wiebe, who opposes the mayor’s proposal.
Commercial 6
Article content material
“It’s a wholesome dialogue between two elected our bodies,” mentioned Wiebe, who deliberate to deal with council Wednesday to oppose the transfer. “A little bit little bit of friction is useful to make sure the most effective curiosity of parks and pure areas.”
Tim Louis, a lawyer and former COPE Vancouver councillor, believes Sim’s proposal poses a menace to the way forward for town’s public areas.
“Their swagger would have us imagine that remodeling the park board into the park division, and inserting it neatly between (all the opposite municipal departments) could have no unfavorable impact on the safety of our parks,” Louis mentioned. “And naturally, he’s completely mistaken.”
“This use of the phrase ‘everlasting’ could be very intelligent. It leaves the door broad open for parks that haven’t been designated as everlasting,” Louis mentioned. “So, say goodbye to half or all of Sundown Seashore.”
dfumano@postmedia.com
twitter.com/fumano
Associated Tales
Turf struggle: Inside what could possibly be the start of the top for Vancouver’s park board
Transfer to abolish Vancouver park board reveals rift in Mayor Ken Sim’s ABC social gathering
Dan Fumano: ‘Normal ambiance of loopy’ as Vancouver park board drama continues
Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the information you have to know — add VancouverSun.com and TheProvince.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
You may as well help our journalism by changing into a digital subscriber: For simply $14 a month, you will get limitless entry to The Vancouver Solar, The Province, Nationwide Submit and 13 different Canadian information websites. Assist us by subscribing immediately: The Vancouver Solar | The Province.
Article content material
Share this text in your social community
[ad_2]
Source link
